Making the invisible visible The Martians decide to pay you a visit one day. You greet them and take them out to your farm so that they can experience a little bit of life here on Earth. There's a stubborn mule near the barn that won't budge and you need to get the beast out of the way. One of the Martians tells you that he can help. He goes out there and you see this... |
electric -- is an abstract concept. Does it make sense to say that your dog is tied to the pole because he is physically bound by love or by information or by energy? A genuine physicist MUST propose a physical object as a mediator. Otherwise, his explanation is irrational. All causes in Physics had better have a physical mediator!
How do we PHYSICALLY restrain a prisoner? Do we restrain him with laws? Justice? Deterrence? Or does the physical police grab him and lock him up in a physical cell? In his immense ignorance, the deranged mathemagician may suggest that we restrain prisoners with laws. This may be a great metaphor in ordinary speech -- much like the saying that "love moves mountains" -- but it has no place in Physics. In Physics, the proponent MUST propose objects such as jails, walls, metal bars and rods. These things can PHYSICALLY restrain a prisoner, not the abstract concept justice. In the same vein, the word 'field' cannot be used as a baseball bat in Physics. You have no choice but to simulate the phenomenon with some kind of object. But let's look at the 'field' in light most favorable to the mathemagicians for the sake of argument. Let's convert the 'field' into an object. How does the 'field' do it? Please explain the mechanism. Merely stating that the 'field' does it is again invoking magic. For that matter, they could have said that X does it. WHAT is X? We can all understand the mechanism if the so-called 'field' is shaped like a bowl and the Moon moves around in circles on its curved walls. So now, how do the mathemagicians explain a pen falling to the floor with the same 'field' mechanism? What prevents the pen from falling upwards towards the ceiling? |
Please tell the Martian what prevents the Moon from flying out of the Solar System. Make the invisible visible for him. You can't say that there is absolutely nothing preventing a stone like the Moon from flying away simply because you can't see what mediates the transaction. If you claim that there is nothing, you are a proud yet ignorant mathemagician, a religious fool who has no common sense for Physics. Note that equations, variables, and numbers are of no use in this regard. They can at best help you describe what is happening. They cannot help you explain the mechanism. A description is just a listing of properties. An explanation is the prosecutor's version of what caused the phenomenon to happen. In order to answer the question, you have no choice but to propose an invisible physical mediator that restrains the Moon. Einstein's ridiculous General Relativity Theory Einstein proposed that something the mathemagicians call 'a' field comes in physical contact with the skin of the Moon. This so-called gravity well can be likened to a curved bowl of sorts. The Moon rolls around this well much like the ball rolls around the roulette. |
More than surprised, you are scared. You've never seen anything like it. "How did you do that? Do you use magic?" "Do what?" asks the Martian. "Pull on the mule!" "I did it just like you earthlings pull on a donkey or a horse here on Earth. I tied a rope around the mule's head." "What rope? I didn't see any rope." "Oh, I see what the problem is. The ropes in Mars give off an infra red light and you earthlings cannot see in that range. But no, we don't use magic. It just seems that way to you because you don't see the rope I'm using." Now that he explained to you the simple mechanism, the magic is gone. It seemed to work like magic only because you couldn't see the physical intermediary that he used. Imagine if someone asked you how you breathe. You answer that you take in air through your nostrils, but he says that he can't see any air going through your nose. What the Martian did was make the invisible visible. That's when the mechanism stopped working as if by magic. What appeared to be a miracle is now made plain through visualization. You even feel silly to have believed for a minute that the process worked by magic simply because you couldn't see the rope and feel like borrowing this Martian lasso to play a trick on your friends. So now's your turn. Here we have an invisible mechanism that no one has been able to explain rationally. We call it gravity... |
Einstein's curved 'field' No one since the days of Newton ever discovered that 'field' is a concept. There is no standalone physical object called 'field'. It is self evident to a rational human being that concepts have no power or authority to affect matter. Yet Einstein uses this word 'field' as a physical object to restrain the Moon. No one in the Mathemagical Establishment ever questioned such hogwash! |
The mathemagical version of gravity: magic. According to the mathemagicians there is absolutely NOTHING binding the Moon to the Earth. |
The Rope Model of gravity: rationality All atoms are interconnected. Every atom comprising the Moon is bound to every atom comprising the Earth. The Earth swings the Moon around itself. This explains why the Moon cannot drift out of the Solar System |
WHAT physical object causes the pen to fall DOWN to the Earth? |
Why doesn't the pen fall upwards towards the sky? |
What is appalling is that there are frail-minded folk who don't even understand the question. Many of them come to the forums and argue authoritatively about 'physics'... |
Method by rote, now ask:
2. What evidence or proof can you present for the existence of these ropes? 3. What experiment can we run to confirm that there are EM ropes? What these offensive questions show is that those who ask them are simply unfamiliar with the Scientific Method. In Science, we ONLY EXPLAIN and do so rationally. What you choose to believe after the show is your personal business and doesn't concern Science! In order to explain, the presenter MUST make an ASSUMPTION regarding an invisible entity: "Let us ASSUME that every atom in the Universe is bound to all others via EM ropes." Now the presenter can proceed to explain his theory. The purpose of the explanation is so that the audience UNDERSTANDS the EXPLANATION. It is NOT to persuade or to convince or to sway the jury. It is in religion where they run experiments, INTERPRET, and present their interpretation as PROOF in order to PERSUADE in order to RECRUIT. The mathemagicians are in the business of persuading because they want to recruit because they want to keep their jobs and the funds flowing in. In Science, we merely explain and understand. The religionist of Mathemagics insists: "Okay. This means that I can propose XYZ, God, ghosts or angels..." Yes! The proponent can invent any object he wants and name it what he wants. But it's got to be an OBJECT! We can't transfer CONCEPTS such as energy or information... or soul or spirit in Physics! Once an object is presented, the trick now consists of using this mediator consistently and to cover every base. He can use angels to move the Earth around the Sun and God to pull pens towards the ground if he wants and if that is how he explains a phenomenon. Whether the crowd shares his views is another matter. Nevertheless, now comes the tricky part. How does he explain properties such as the rectilinear propagation of light, Faraday and Maxwell Laws, atomic orbitals, magnetic field and consistent acceleration of gravity with angels? This is where the Rope Model reigns supreme. The EM Rope is the only entity we can imagine that merges light with gravity. The Rope is the architecture that justifies the Grand Unified Theory that the mathemagicians have been searching for all these years. It is simple and symmetric. |
What is gravity? |
There is no such thing as 'instantaneous motion'. Instantaneous motion means that there is motion in a photograph or picture or sculpture. What has happened is that the mathemagicians never figured out that TENSION is not a FORCE! Force involves motion. Tension does not. Newton's Universal Equation is not an equation of force, but of tension. |
Do we need a physical object to mediate action-at-a-distance? If you reply that we don't, you are doing 'physics' with magic! The fact that we don't see the air we breathe does not mean that thereare no molecules around our mouths. So? What invisible physical object mediates gravity? We propose that EM Ropes interconnect all atoms. Now we can visualize the invisible mechanism of gravity. |
To comment on any of the pages in this website go to: Rational Science |