- SPACE: A Religion Called General Relativity
TIME: Absolute Relativistic Nonsense
FORCE: A Quantum of Bunk!
LIGHT: The Grand Unified Theory
GRAVITY: Why Pioneer X is Decelerating
FIELD: How a Magnet Really Works
UNIVERSE: Why Black Holes Don't Exist
LIFE: Why Gays are Attracted to Men
DEATH: Why UFOs Don't Exist
CREATION: Why God Doesn't Exist
| Contents |
In this day and age it is impossible to publish a new scientific theory through the established media. A
book publisher will not even read your manuscript unless you have first gone through the peer review
process. Without a healthy dose of authority behind your submission it will remain a promise. Therefore,
if you wish to challenge the establishment's version of light, gravity, the atom, electricity, magnetism, and
other natural phenomena, it is next to impossible to do it all at once. You will first be required to submit a
series of papers establishing a milestone in each category through official channels. One problem with
this process is that it takes about two years to publish a paper! This means that if you have 50 new ideas
never before considered by the establishment, it would take you about 100 years to publish them if one is
founded upon another. A more formidable obstacle is religion. The peer review system is inordinately
biased in favor of the religion of Mathematical Physics. Imagine submitting a paper arguing against God to
a secret inquisition board comprised of 3 Christians, 2 Muslims, and 1 Buddhist. What are the chances of
getting published? So now assume that you suspect the fantastic physical interpretations offered by
Mathematical Physics. You submit your paper to a publisher who presents it for review to a secret panel
consisting of 3 relativists, 2 mechanics, and 1 string theorist. What do you think will be your chances of
publishing your article within this century? Yet I believe that this site provides sufficient evidence in
support of the argument that the fundamentals of Mathematical Physics are misconstrued (e.g., point, line,
distance, dimensions). You have to agree that as a minimum the establishment needs to clean up its act.
It is for this reason that I have chosen not to publish through the peer review system any more. The
peer review system is not a method that scientists have invented to ensure that only scientific papers get
published. It is rather a method the establishment has found to censor those who threaten the theories
and research projects that are currently being funded. This is not science at its best. This is religion at its
worst.
The authentic spirit of science thrives when the valve to communication is opened:
- " The free, unhampered exchange of ideas and scientific conclusions is necessary for
the sound development of science, as it is in all spheres of cultural life."
" The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship will be the death of science."
- Unfortunately, the 'scientific' mainstream has departed from these words of wisdom. Popular
journals such as Nature and Science are not in the business of science any more. They are in the
business of making money. For this they need to make their readers happy. And since most readers have
been conditioned in college to believe in mainstream theories that have been around for a century, the
editors censure anything that departs from these expectations. The establishment has effectively worked
its way to a catch-22 situation. Readers have been conditioned to take the fantastic conclusions of
Mathematical Physics for science and the journals fear disappointing their customers.
If you want to read new theories and make up your own mind about them, you certainly will not find
these in the most prestigious journals. The editors of these magazines have already made up their minds
for you. They tell you the same thing over and over again. That black holes have been confirmed... again.
That nature is weirder than you think and that you should set aside your intuition. That a ground-breaking
study now suggests that dark matter may exist... again. That the folks at WMAP have confirmed that
although space is curved, the Universe is flat... again. By the time the information reaches you, it has been
thoroughly 'laundered' by the establishment. We have reached a situation today where the wolves are
guarding the sheep. If things continue as they are, you will from now on and forever read about black
holes, time warps, ad hoc virtual particles that pop out of nowhere, parallel universes separated from each
other by nothing, and the wonders of String Theory. What do these fantasies have to do with the real
world?
- Why God Doesn't Exist (WGDE) presents a fresh perspective on the nature of light and
gravity that unlike General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics is rational. It is rational not because I say
so. It is rational because, among other reasons, I can illustrate what I am talking about. For instance, I can
point to a picture or to a statue or to a mockup of the invisible mechanism that underlies the phenomenon
we know as light. I can make a movie of this entity and simulate Young's slit experiment or the
photoelectric effect. You don't need a mathematician to interpret for you what your eyes are seeing. You
can judge the merits of my proposals on your own without an intermediary. It is by replacing the alleged
'language of science' (i.e., Mathematics) with the true language of science (i.e., visualization) that you
bypass the censors, and this is what they fear the most.
What does a mathematical physicist offer you in the alternative? What movie can a relativist make of
Mercury's perihelion shift if he admittedly cannot even imagine space-time? What is he going to put in the
first frame of the movie? A photograph of space? A picture of a rotating 4D tesseract? What is a mechanic
going to point to at the start of his explanation for the photoelectric effect? To a 2D wave-packet? To a
mathematical wave function? Is this what light is? Is this what an electron is? What is a string theorist
going to exhibit at the industrial fair? A statue of a 1-D string? What dimension does this 1-D 'entity'
have? Height? The mathematicians cannot explain a single phenomenon of nature. They can only
describe what they observe with equations and functions:
- " Philosophers of science point out that science doesn't answer why questions, it
only answers how questions. Science doesn't explain; science describes." [2]
This is what the establishment mistakenly identifies with Science.
In WGDE, I criticize the appalling ineptitude of the scientific establishment and challenge the theories of
Mathematical Physics. I say that the irrational conclusions at which the mathematicians have arrived are a
consequence of disregarding the scientific method. The bureaucrats who sit on anonymous peer
censorship boards have lost touch with Science. The entire scientific community still lives in the Dark
Ages as far as an understanding of nature is concerned, still offering supernatural and irrational
explanations for physical phenomena as was the norm 1000 years ago. The currency of ignorance today
is Mathematics, not because there is anything wrong with Math itself. It is by relying exclusively on
Mathematics that prevents a theorist from using common sense and visualizing the invisible subatomic
world. You should not be surprised, therefore, that the rednecks in a court somewhere in Kansas
determined that Science may now also include supernatural explanations. You can't blame them. The
mathematical physicists have been offering supernatural explanations now for about 100 years and the
editors of journals don't bat an eyelash anymore. The mathematicians have nothing better to offer.
WGDE serves as a complement to this web site. Among its highlights you will discover:
- • a model of the atom that is genuinely compatible with quantum numbers
and Schrodinger's wave equation
• a model of the neutron that does away with the ridiculous billiard ball
world of Quantum Mechanics, not to mention the amusing world of strings
• how electricity and magnets really work (i.e., physically)
• how celestial bodies really (physically) generate their magnetic fields
• the physical mechanisms underlying charge, diffraction, tunneling, and
polarization
• a physical explanation for phenomena such as reflection, refraction,
the slit experiment, the photoelectric effect, gravitational lensing,
Olbers' Paradox, etc.
• why the ropes of Thread Theory don't get tangled (Under QM, the
question is why two 'photons' don't interact.)
• a rational definition of the word life
• the correct arguments you should use against those who believe that
God exists (specifically addressing the holy books and arguments of
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Buddhists, Taoists, and, of course, of our
beloved relativists)
- WGDE proposes an entirely new version of our Universe. Our Universe is not comprised of particles. It
is interwoven by electromagnetic threads. Every atom in the Universe is connected to all others. Light
consists of a torsion along this DNA-like configuration, and gravity is a tension caused by an aggregate of
these ropes. There are only two forces in the Universe, two forms of physical contact that we can
imagine: push (light) and pull (gravity). The mathematical physicists have invented in addition the weak
force (another form of push) and the strong interaction (another form of pull). In Quantum there are two
forms of push and two forms of pull. The mechanics refer to these two forces as the four forces or
interactions. They specifically clarify that a particle has the ability to carry one of these forces and deliver
it upon contact with another. Just in case, the scholars throw in a caveat that you should suspect your
intuition and take their word at face value because it is backed by authority and Math.
WGDE is written and illustrated for the layman yet it contains thought-provoking material for the expert
as well. I have gone out of my way to simplify complex issues of Mathematical Physics -- not an easy task.
The project required sifting the most important questions that researchers are investigating and
presenting the material in a way that the average person could understand. Depicting the explanations
and concepts with images does not detract from the book's merits. Quite the contrary! Illustrations
simplify complex topics even for the expert:
- " If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't really understand it." R. Feynman
" If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough… It should
be possible to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid." A. Einstein
The notion that we need sophisticated scientific language (i.e., equations) to understand how a dull rock
such as Mercury rolls around the Sun is a myth created by the mathematical establishment. You don't
need a function to understand how or why a pen rolled off the table and onto the floor after an earth-
quake. All you need is to watch the film.
The book contains over 300 illustrations, and this certainly helps visualize the contrasts between the
proposals of Mathematical Physics and those that arise from the rope model. WGDE is structured
similarly to these web pages. Therefore, if you more or less understood the concepts depicted here, you
will feel quite at home with WGDE.
WGDE strives to show that there is no God, no miracle, no supernatural explanation for the workings
of the Universe as claimed by General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, and traditional
religion. WGDE holds that Big Bang is a creationist theory in disguise. The Big Bang Theory is nothing
more than a veiled way of selling God. Big Bang is, as Christian apologist William Lane Craig says, just a
stealthy form of Creation ex-nihilo. That's why 'scientists' such as Jastrow and Sandage today help
individuals such as Craig spread Christianity, while pseudo-atheists like Hawking and Davies spend their
time apologizing and creating excuses for why they don't know.
If you are open to new ideas and want to have a fresh look at science, specifically the physical workings
of light, gravity, electricity, magnetism, etc., WGDE provides you with a rational alternative. You will never
listen to a mathematician again. That's my sales pitch!
- Chapter One
Chapter Two
Chapter Three
Chapter Four
Chapter Five
Chapter Six
Chapter Seven
Chapter Eight
Chapter Nine
Chapter Ten
- ________________________________________________________________________________________
- Last modified 08/21/09
- Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2009
| We are committed to maintaining this site pop-up and ad free. It has the sole purpose of popularizing scientific and philosophical ideas. If you enjoyed what you saw, prefer not to buy the book, and would rather help with a noble cause, your contribution will be greatly appreciated. |
| Me? No, I'm just a poor panhandler. The politicians and religious leaders, now those people... they're REALLY into the big thing! |
| Are you still listening to the fairy tales of relativity? |
| Click here to download a pdf copy of the book right now. $17.50 |
Download Product Details
516 pages, 316 illustrations
Publisher: ViNi (June 14, 2009)
Language: English
ISBN 978-0-9704960-2-7
Price: $17.50
516 pages, 316 illustrations
Publisher: ViNi (June 14, 2009)
Language: English
ISBN 978-0-9704960-2-7
Price: $17.50
| Click on the book to order a single, downloadable pdf file of the book right now |
Downloadable Product Details
516 pages, 316 illustrations
Publisher: ViNi (June 14, 2009)
Language: English
ISBN 978-0-9704960-2-7
Price: $17.50
516 pages, 316 illustrations
Publisher: ViNi (June 14, 2009)
Language: English
ISBN 978-0-9704960-2-7
Price: $17.50
Jogena's - eBook and eZine Directories - Get Listed Today!
| To obtain a paperback, please order through the comments section at |
| To obtain a paperback, please order through the comments section at |