SPACE: A Religion Called General Relativity

    TIME: Absolute Relativistic Nonsense

    FORCE: A Quantum of Bunk!

    LIGHT: The Grand Unified Theory

    GRAVITY: Why Pioneer X is Decelerating  

    FIELD: How a Magnet Really Works

    UNIVERSE: Why Black Holes Don't Exist

    LIFE: Why Gays are Attracted to Men

    DEATH: Why UFOs Don't Exist

    CREATION: Why God Doesn't Exist
                           Product Details

    Paperback: 516 pages, 316 illustrations

    Publisher: ViNi (February 8, 2008)

    Language: English

    ISBN 978-0-9704960-5-8  

    Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 11.0 x 1.0 inches

    Shipping Weight: 3.5 lbs.

    Price: $30.00  + shipping
Contents

    In this day and age it is impossible to publish a new scientific theory through the established media. A book publisher
    will not even read your manuscript unless you have first gone through the peer review process. Without a healthy dose
    of authority behind your submission it will remain a promise. Therefore,  if you wish to challenge the establishment's
    version of light, gravity, the atom, electricity, magnetism, and other natural phenomena, it is next to impossible to do it
    all at once. You will first be required to submit a series of papers establishing a milestone in each category through
    official channels. One problem with this process is that it takes about two years to publish a paper! This means that if
    you have 50 new ideas never before considered by the establishment, it would take you about 100 years to publish
    them if one is founded upon another. A more formidable obstacle is religion. The peer review system is inordinately
    biased in favor of the religion of Mathematical Physics. Imagine submitting a paper arguing against God to a secret
    inquisition board comprised of 3 Christians, 2 Muslims, and 1 Buddhist. What are the chances of getting published?
    So now assume that you suspect the fantastic physical interpretations offered by Mathematical Physics. You submit
    your paper to a publisher who presents it for review to a secret panel consisting of 3 relativists, 2 mechanics, and
    1 string theorist. What do you think will be your chances of publishing your article within this century? Yet I believe
    that this site provides sufficient evidence in support of the argument that the fundamentals of Mathematical Physics
    are misconstrued (e.g., point, line, distance, dimensions). You have to agree that as a minimum the establishment
    needs to clean up its act.

    It is for this reason that I have chosen not to publish through the peer review system any more. The peer review
    system is not a method that scientists have invented to ensure that only scientific papers get published. It is rather
    a method the establishment has found to censor those who threaten the theories and research projects that are
    currently being funded. This is not science at its best. This is religion at its worst.

    The authentic spirit of science thrives when the valve to communication is opened:

    " The free, unhampered exchange of ideas and scientific conclusions is necessary for
      the sound development of science, as it is in all spheres of cultural life."


    " The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship will be the death of science."


    Unfortunately, the 'scientific' mainstream has departed from these words of wisdom. Popular journals such
    as Nature and Science are not in the business of science any more. They are in the business of making money. For
    this they need to make their readers happy. And since most readers have been conditioned in college to believe in
    mainstream theories that have been around for a century, the editors censure anything that departs from these
    expectations. The establishment has effectively worked its way to a catch-22 situation. Readers have been
    conditioned to take the fantastic conclusions of Mathematical Physics for science and the journals fear
    disappointing their customers.

    If you want to read new theories and make up your own mind about them, you certainly will not find these in the
    most prestigious journals. The editors of these magazines have already made up their minds for you. They tell you
    the same thing over and over again. That black holes have been confirmed... again. That nature is weirder than you
    think and that you should set aside your intuition. That a ground-breaking study now suggests that dark matter
    may exist... again. That the folks at WMAP have confirmed that although space is curved, the Universe is flat...
    again. By the time the information reaches you, it has been thoroughly 'laundered' by the establishment. We have
    reached a situation today where the wolves are guarding the sheep. If things continue as they are, you will from
    now on and forever read about black holes, time warps, ad hoc virtual particles that pop out of nowhere, parallel
    universes separated from each other by nothing, and the wonders of String Theory.  What do these fantasies have
    to do with the real world?

    Why God Doesn't Exist (WGDE) presents a fresh perspective on the nature of light and gravity
    that unlike General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics is rational. It is rational not because I say so. It is rational
    because, among other reasons, I can illustrate what I am talking about. For instance, I can point to a picture or to a
    statue or to a mockup of the invisible mechanism that underlies the phenomenon we know as light. I can make a
    movie of this entity and simulate Young's slit experiment or the photoelectric effect. You don't need a mathematician
    to interpret for you what your eyes are seeing. You can judge the merits of my proposals on your own without an
    intermediary. It is by replacing the alleged 'language of science' (i.e., Mathematics) with the true language of science
    (i.e., visualization) that you bypass the censors, and this is what they fear the most.

    What does a mathematical physicist offer you in the alternative? What movie can a relativist make of Mercury's
    perihelion shift if he admittedly cannot even imagine space-time? What is he going to put in the first frame of the
    movie? A photograph of space? A picture of a rotating 4D tesseract? What is a mechanic going to point to at the
    start of his explanation for the photoelectric effect? To a 2D wave-packet? To a mathematical wave function? Is
    this what light is? Is this what an electron is? What is a string theorist going to exhibit at the industrial fair? A
    statue of a  1-D string? What dimension does this 1-D 'entity' have? Height? The mathematicians cannot explain
    a single phenomenon of nature. They can only describe what they observe with equations and functions:

    " Philosophers of science point out that science doesn't answer why questions, it
      only answers how questions. Science doesn't explain; science describes." [2]

    This is what the establishment mistakenly identifies with Science.

    In WGDE, I criticize the appalling ineptitude of the scientific establishment and challenge the theories of
    Mathematical Physics. I say that the irrational conclusions at which the mathematicians have arrived are a
    consequence of disregarding the scientific method. The bureaucrats who sit on anonymous peer censorship
    boards have lost touch with Science. The entire scientific community still lives in the Dark Ages as far as an
    understanding of nature is concerned, still offering supernatural and irrational explanations for physical
    phenomena as was the norm 1000 years ago. The currency of ignorance today is Mathematics, not because
    there is anything wrong with Math itself. It is by relying exclusively on Mathematics that prevents a theorist from
    using common sense and visualizing the invisible subatomic world. You should not be surprised, therefore, that
    the rednecks in a court somewhere in Kansas determined that Science may now also include supernatural
    explanations. You can't blame them. The mathematical physicists have been offering supernatural explanations
    now for about 100 years and the editors of journals don't bat an eyelash anymore. The mathematicians have
    nothing better to offer.

    WGDE serves as a complement to this web site. Among its highlights you will discover:

       a model of the atom that is genuinely compatible with quantum numbers
         and Schrodinger's wave equation

       a model of the neutron that does away with the ridiculous billiard ball
         world of Quantum Mechanics, not to mention the amusing world of strings

       how electricity and magnets really work (i.e., physically)

       how celestial bodies really (physically) generate their magnetic fields

       the physical mechanisms underlying charge, diffraction, tunneling, and
         polarization

       a physical explanation for phenomena such as reflection, refraction,
         the slit experiment, the photoelectric effect, gravitational lensing,
         Olbers' Paradox, etc.

       why the ropes of Thread Theory don't get tangled (Under QM, the
         question is why two 'photons' don't interact.)

       a rational definition of the word life

       the correct arguments you should use against those who believe that
         God exists (specifically addressing the holy books and arguments of
         Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Buddhists, Taoists, and, of course, of our
         beloved relativists)

    WGDE proposes an entirely new version of our Universe. Our Universe is not comprised of particles. It is
    interwoven by electromagnetic threads. Every atom in the Universe is connected to all others. Light consists
    of a torsion along this DNA-like configuration, and gravity is a tension caused by an aggregate of these ropes.
    There are only two forces in the Universe, two forms of physical contact that we can imagine: push (light) and
    pull (gravity). The mathematical physicists have invented in addition the weak force (another form of push) and
    the strong interaction (another form of pull). In Quantum there are two forms of push and two forms of pull. The
    mechanics refer to these two forces as the four forces or interactions. They specifically clarify that a particle has
    the ability to carry one of these forces and deliver it upon contact with another. Just in case, the scholars throw
    in a caveat that you should suspect your intuition and take their word at face value because it is backed by
    authority and Math.

    WGDE is written and illustrated for the layman yet it contains thought-provoking material for the expert as
    well. I have gone out of my way to simplify complex issues of Mathematical Physics -- not an easy task. The
    project required sifting the most important questions that researchers are investigating and presenting the
    material in a way that the average person could understand. Depicting the explanations and concepts with
    images does not detract from the book's merits. Quite the contrary! Illustrations simplify complex topics even
    for the expert:

    " If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't really understand it."   R. Feynman

    " If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough… It should
      be possible to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid."   A. Einstein

    The notion that we need sophisticated scientific language (i.e., equations) to understand how a dull rock such
    as Mercury rolls around the Sun is a myth created by the mathematical establishment. You don't need a function
    to understand how or why a pen rolled off the table and onto the floor after an earth-quake. All you need is to
    watch the film.

    The book contains over 300 illustrations, and this certainly helps visualize the contrasts between the
    proposals of Mathematical Physics and those that arise from the rope model.  WGDE is structured similarly to
    these web pages. Therefore, if you more or less understood the concepts depicted here, you will feel quite at
    home with WGDE.

    WGDE strives to show that there is no God, no miracle, no supernatural explanation for the workings of
    the Universe as claimed by General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, and traditional religion.
    WGDE holds that Big Bang is a creationist theory in disguise. The Big Bang Theory is nothing more than a
    veiled way of selling God. Big Bang is, as Christian apologist William Lane Craig says, just a stealthy  form
    of Creation ex-nihilo. That's why 'scientists' such as Jastrow and Sandage today help individuals such as
    Craig spread Christianity, while pseudo-atheists like Hawking and Davies spend their time apologizing and
    creating excuses for why they don't know.

    If you are open to new ideas and want to have a fresh look at science, specifically the physical workings of
    light, gravity, electricity, magnetism, etc., WGDE provides you with a rational alternative. You will never listen
    to a mathematician again. That's my sales pitch!
    Chapter One

    Chapter Two

    Chapter Three

    Chapter Four

    Chapter Five

    Chapter Six

    Chapter Seven

    Chapter Eight

    Chapter Nine

    Chapter Ten

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 09/17/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008

We are committed to maintaining
this site pop-up and ad free. It
has the sole purpose of
popularizing scientific and
philosophical ideas.
If you enjoyed what you saw,
prefer not to buy the book, and
would rather help with a noble
cause, your contribution will be
greatly appreciated.
Me? No, I'm just a
poor panhandler. The
politicians and
religious leaders,
now those people...
they're REALLY into
the big thing!
Official PayPal Seal
Are you still
listening to the
fairy tales of
relativity?
You can order a paperback
  
  version of WGDE @

      
 Rational Science
You can order a paperback
  
 version of WGDE @

   
   Rational Science