Dinosaur Extinction: One More Hypothesis

Max W. De Laubenfels


    Many large and previously flourishing animals became extinct at the close of the Cretaceous. The date
    of their passing may have been a matter of thousands of years, but no fossil evidence clearly proves
    this idea; the time might have been much more brief. No proof exists as to what caused these extinctions;
    we have only the opinions or guesses of various paleontologists. Several bits of evidence do exist,
    however, and may be reconsidered. These clues point toward one explanation which has seldom been
    noticed and never emphasized, but which deserves notice along with the others.

    The literature on plant fossils indicates that a drastic change in the world's vegetation occurred between
    the Jurassic and the Cretaceous, but not at the Laramide Revolution (the end of the mesozoic).
    Angiosperms were certainly extremely rare before the Cretaceous, but during that period they increased
    with explosive rapidity, and assigned the dominant position in the world's landscape that they now occupy.
    The Raritan (Cretaceous) formation of New Jersey contains over 200 species of fossil Angiosperms,
    about 70 percent of all the plant species that occur there. In the succeeding Magothy fora (still Cretaceous)
    the modern type plants are equally dominant with (for example) oaks, sassafras, tulip trees, sedges, and
    grasses.

    The Cretaceous grasses warrant emphasis. These plants, seemingly humble, are the world's best fodder
    for large animals. In zoos, the large mammals are appropriately called the "hay stock." The great herds
    of American bison lived in grassland. The huge African animals, such as zebra, rhinoceros and eland, are
    inhabitants of the grassy plains or veldt; grass is their necessary nourishment. The Dakota flora, also of
    Cretaceous antiquity, is very interesting, comprising several hundred species, 90 percent of which are
    flowering plants. This quite modern-type vegetation occurred through Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska and
    Kansas, where Bison recently Flourished, and where the large Cretaceous animals similarly nourished.

    There is no evidence of a radical change in the world's vegetation at the time of or since the Laramide
    Revolution. The Eocene reveals plant life continuing in much the same pattern as before the "revolution."
    The animals that prospered on that vegetation for millions of years in the Cretaceous should have
    continued into the Tertiary), but many did not. Which ones did not? Why did some survive?

    There is no evidence of a radical change in the under-water life of the earth coincident with the Laramide
    Revolution, although many large cephalopods died out. This is to say that the completely aquatic faunas
    of the Paleocene do not differ markedly from those of the late Cretaceous. Thus a study of the fossils of
    most invertebrate and fish groups does not offer clues as to the nature of the post-Cretaceous reptilian
    catastrophe.

    Non-aquatic invertebrates are, and long have been, chiefly hexapod in nature. The paleontologic record
    of insects is too irregular, too often broken, to help with the present problem. Non-aquatic vertebrates,
    however, do afford some extremely interesting data. Reptilian life reached a climax in the Cretaceous.
    These animals were more numerous and larger than ever before, immensely more numerous and
    individually large than since. Almost certainly the increasingly nourishing plant life contributed to this
    waxing in length, girth and abundance. Seven or eight orders of Reptilia existed in the late Cretaceous.

    The Chelonia had been present since at least the Triassic, about as common as they are today.

    The Sauropterygia were represented in the Cretaceous only by the plesiosaurs, which had turtle-like
    bodies and long snakelike necks. Their obvious ancestry goes back to the Triassic. The Ichthyosarlria
    were even more beautifully adapted to fish-catching, but they appear to have become extinct early in
    the Cretaceous. Large plesiosaurs may also have vanished prior to late Cretaceous, although this is
    not certain. The Rhynchocephalia must have existed through the Cretaceous because one species
    (Sphenodon) still lives in New Zealand. This primitive type goes back at least to the Triassic, and is
    represented by at least one species in the Jurassic, but by no Cretaceous or Tertiary fossils. It is much
    like the earliest (Carboniferous) reptiles.

    The Crocodilia, new in the Jurassic, continued through the Cretaceous, survived its close, and have
    become more common in the Cenozoic. The Pterosauria, new in the Jurassic, flourished through that
    period and until the end of the Cretaceous, when they became extinct. If one regards the Dinosauria
    as a single order, there were seven reptilian orders in the Cretaceous, but there were eight if one
    separates the Dinosauria, as is probably better, into two orders. The Saurischia appeared in the
    Triassic, and were large and numerous through the Jurassic, reaching a climax of size and abundance
    late in the Cretaceous. The Ornithischia did not certainly evolve until the Jurassic, but were extremely
    common and big animals until the Laramide Revolution.

    The Squamata, new in the Jurassic, became more common in the Cretaceous, and have increased
    further in the Cenozoic. In the late Cretaceous we find common large aquatic lizards called mosasaurs,
    a few iguanid lizards similar to the modern Sauromalus, a few anguinomorphs like the Recent "slow
    worms" and gila monster, some Platymota (monitors) and a few, newly evolved Serpentes. Some of
    these. were burrowing forms, others resembled Recent boas.

    Aves appeared in the Jurassic, but, perhaps because out-flown by pterosaurs, they remained uncommon
    throughout the rest of the Mesozoic. Only since the reptilian competition has been reduced have birds
    greatly flourished. This they have indeed done through the whole Cenozoic to date. They waxed rapidly
    in importance early in the Tertiary.

    The first certain Mammalia are Cretaceous in age, although several Jurassic fossils are probably of this
    class, and some Triassic Ictidosauria, certainly at least intermediate, may already have produced milk
    for their young. It is clear that Cretaceous mammals were uncommon and small. The outstanding type
    as one that differed little from the modern opossum. With the advent of the Tertiary, mammals suddenly
    increased greatly in size and abundance, filling niches left vacant by the extensive reptilian extinctions.

    It seems to me that one should find some explanation of the events in analysis of what perished and what
    survived.

    Of the dinosaur extinction, A. S. Romer says it ". . . is one of the most dramatic events in vertebrate
    history." Many hypotheses have been advanced to account for the observed facts. Not one of them has
    been proven; all are speculative, quite as much as the present one. In 1937, while reading and discussing
    the above-described paleontologic events, an additional explanation occurred to me; that is to say, one
    more theory as to what may have caused the change in fauna at the close of the Cretaceous. Many to
    whom I have suggested this explanation point out objections, and quite properly. In all fairness it should be
    kept in mind, however, that grave objections are also offered against all the other opinions or hypotheses.

    I suggest an event, or series of events, of brief heat, of temperatures high enough to kill exposed large
    animals in certain parts of the world. My suggestion has been criticized because it presumably did not
    account for the lack of change in flora at the end of the Cretaceous, and by another critic who argued
    that it did not account for the great change in flora at that time. As noted above, the evidence favors a
    Cretaceous vegetation much like that of the present. Romer suggests that lack of proper food plants
    caused the extinctions, but does not belabor the point. Modern type vegetation is today more nourishing
    than the gymnosperms and pteridophytes which dominated the Jurassic, and dinosaurs seem to have
    prospered more, rather that less, after modern vegetation appeared in the Cretaceous.

    Brief heating would let enough vegetation escape to re-seed the world. Out-of-the way areas of the
    sort represented now by New Zealand would probably survive. Many plants live as roots while destroyed
    above ground, and sprout again. Others survive catastrophes as seeds although their mature plants perish.
    The events that I postulate would selectively favor Arctic and sub-Arctic vegetation, and many Cretaceous
    plants that survived the Tertiary are such as now flourish in the cooler regions, or on islands.

    A common suggestion or opinion is that egg-eating enemies brought about extinction of the large reptiles.
    Why should egg-eaters select those and spare the eggs of birds, lizards and turtles! Were dinosaur eggs
    larger than ostrich eggs, or Apteryx eggs? Flightless birds characterized the Cretaceous as much or more
    than now, and many egg-eaters can climb or fly. This theory may be correct, but is completely speculative.
    Some experts suggest that the large reptiles perished because of pituitary abnormalities. They certainly
    had large pituitary glands, but they were so supplied for literally millions of years, probably more than a
    hundred million years. A million years ago man's ancestors were still apelike. The large reptiles had been
    obviously healthy and prosperous for this vast length of time, with over-sized pituitaries all that while. Why
    then should they all perish so nearly simultaneously, from such a well tolerated gland?

    One opinion has it that the whole world became lethally cold, or a cold age that lasted comparatively long
    in geologic terms. This would certainly have killed the dinosaurs. This theory has the great merit of
    accounting for the preferential survival of birds and mammals. They have such effective insulatory body
    covering (feathers and fur) that they can be, and are, homoisothermous. They endure cold now, and surely
    endured it in the Cretaceous, too.

    World-wide cold would be more nearly complete in action than whatever-it-was that really happened. Palm
    trees survived, for example, and snakes and some lizards. Most significant, the geologist does not find any
    stratigraphic evidence of such a great ice age. The coldest epochs of the Pleistocene never froze the whole
    world; this theory is surely open to question.

    Another hypothesis calls for a time of world-wide high temperature, again lasting comparatively long
    geologically speaking. This doubtless implies a gradual rather than instantaneous origin, and fairly slow
    recovery. It is quite certain that warmer than usual climates affect the continents from time to time.
    Tropical climate has prevailed in what is now north temperate region, probably several different times.
    One may suppose a hotter and hotter planet, even with equatorial regions too warm for animal life. But in
    this case, the dinosaurs would merely have migrated poleward. If our planet became hot enough to kill
    dinosaurs north of latitude 70, not much of anything would have survived anywhere. Sustained heat could
    have finally produced revolutionary changes even in the ocean. There is no stratigraphic record of such
    omnipresent lethal heat.

    There is, however, logical reason to believe that heat was the doom of the dinosaurs; not long continued,
    but brief. Air temperatures may have been near boiling in the tropics, and up to 50°C. as far from the
    equator as latitude 50, but not with regular boundaries. Rather the fierce gales of heated air swirled here
    and there, missing some scattered small areas. Furthermore, where there was much snow to be melted.
    This melting cooled them to sub-lethal temperatures. Life went on in the sub Arctic.

    It would require many centuries to warm up the ocean; even the very surface heats slowly, and the warmer
    water will stay on top, only sinking after a long, poleward journey. in fact, it cools notably before sinking.
    Hence the world's water changed little.

    Let us see how the hypothesis of brief heat accords with the record of survivals and extinctions, why it
    might be preferred to other opinions. As for vegetation--most mature vegetation would probably burn,
    but many roots survive, many seeds survive, and much snow-bound northern (and extreme southern)
    vegetation would survive even as mature plants. The trees and shrubs on mid-oceanic islands would be
    spared. When such an island is now denuded, for example, by a volcano, the rapidity with which it is
    reclothed in vegetation reveals that a nearly denuded world would be again green with plant life in a
    few thousand years.

    Such brief heat would spare the completely aquatic animals, exactly as indicated in the fossil record.
    Chelonia are not merely aquatic. They have an ability to "hold their breath" for hours at a time, under
    water. They may spend the winter in a torpid condition, so immersed in ice that a hot hurricane would
    do little more than thaw them awake. Chelonia did survive. The air-breathing plesiosaurs perished,
    although this may have been in the mid-Cretaceous.

    The Rhynchocephalia survived, and demonstrate how a small animal, not large like a plesiosaur, may
    hold its own in an isolated, out-of-the-way area, which New Zealand is. Furthermore, Sphenodon spends
    much time in crevices or burrows.

    Crocodiles survived, perhaps on the same basis as the turtles. Conceivably, it might have been only one
    batch of eggs, well buried in mud, that lived through a catastrophe.

    The pterosaurs could not hide; they all perished.

    All the dinosaurs perished.

    Many of the Squamata lived through, as follows: Lizards of the Sauromalus type survived. These today
    are noteworthy for their tendency to crawl back into cracks and fissures. Several aguinomorph lizards
    survived; they also are fossorial or crytophilous. Some monitors survived; today they are found chiefly
    on oceanic islands--perhaps they had a similar placement in the Cretaceous. The Serpentes survived
    preferentially, but as already mentioned, some were burrowing forms. The others were of the boa type,
    which, even today, hides amazingly. I have searched for them in the tropics. They were found, but always
    in my experience, hiding in a hollow tree. They lie in wait for the victim, now generally a mammal. This victim,
    perhaps an opossum, crawls into the cavity vainly seeking asylum from its other enemies, only to become
    a dinner for the snake. This doubtless happened to Cretaceous opossums, too. These lizards and snakes
    have such ecological placement and habits that they are exactly the ones that might be expected to live
    through a fiery tempest.

    The birds and mammals survived best of all. The Cenozoic is their period; these two classes have dominated
    the land since the earliest Tertiary time. They can live in the snow-covered high latitudes. Undoubtedly they
    lived there in Cretaceous times as well as now. Even boiling hot air, blowing over miles of snow, would cool
    down to a breathable degree.

    I believe that objective, unprejudiced contemplation will find considerable plausibility in the present hypothesis.

    A wholly reasonable and proper question of course arises; what could have caused brief heat, such as has
    been postulated?

    An historical event occurred, and reading its description caused me to consider the present hypothesis.

    At eight o'clock in the morning of June 30, 1908, a shower of meteorites struck near Vanovara, Siberia;
    these are the so-called Tunguska or Podkamennayn meteorites. Effects were noticed that same day in
    the records of the barograph at Kew Observatory in England, some 5,000 kilometers away, and the
    following evening a peculiar sky-glow was noted in England.

    Study of the site was later conducted (1928) by a party of Russian scientists, led by L. Kulik. His reports,
    and others, are summarized in a chapter of H. H. Nininger's book about meteorites, entitled "Our Stone-
    Pelted Planet." The fiery mass was seen coming from the northeast, and the terrific explosion was heard
    by the inhabitants of the cities of Yenisseisk, Krasnojarsk, Kansk, Nijneudinsk and Kirensk. An earthquake
    was felt as far away as Irkutsk.

    At the point of impact there are numerous craters 50 to 200 meters in diameter, but now nearly filled with
    water, vegetation and debris. The region is extremely wet and swampy.

    In a circle of 20 kilometers diameter, the trees still stood, although scorched and carbonized by intense
    heat. Here the shockwave struck nearly vertically.

    Around this, to a diameter of about 60 kilometers, the trees were prostrate as well as carbonized, tops
    directly away from the center of impact, flattened by the terrific wind. An area of nearly a thousand square
    kilometers had been heated so that all animal life perished. This included several families of human settlers,
    at least 1,500 reindeer, and numberless smaller animals. This is one of the most sparsely inhabited regions
    on earth, or the human deaths would have been far greater and worldwide attention demanded.

    A representative eyewitness report is that of a farmer named Semenov, who lived 80 kilometers from the
    point of impact. He saw the blinding blaze of light and almost at the same instant felt a heat so great that
    he thought his clothes would catch fire. Then there was darkness, or at least he could not see. About four
    minutes later the deafening explosion and air wave hurled him unconscious through the air, and partially
    demolished his house.

    Yet this fall was of meteors that caused only a small fraction of the damage (crater size) of those that
    caused the crater at Winslow, Arizona, some 5,000 rears ago, or the even larger Chubb crater in
    northeastern Canada. Other geologically recent meteoritic craters do not show, because of falls in the
    ocean (four-fifths of the earth's surface) or where vigorous erosion has obliterated them, as in the tropics.

    One may profitably consider the Tunguska meteorite. It is only necessary to postulate a larger event of
    exactly the same kind, to implement the present hypothesis.

    H. C. Urey has written authoritatively and interestingly on the history of the moon. He and others have
    shown that in the early time of our solar system the earth and moon were the targets of colossal
    bombardments. Some scientists assume that this bombardment ceased in the remote Pre-Cambrian,
    except for trivially small meteorites.

    In late October 1937 the asteroid "Hermes" passed so close to the earth that even some astronomers
    envisaged the possibility of collision. It missed our planet by only some 480,000 miles, which is about
    the diameter of the moon's orbit, and only a little more than half the sun's diameter. Should we assume
    that never before in all the earth's history did any other asteroid come closer?

    In view of the near approach of "Hermes," and the evidence of Chubb crater and Winslow, it would not
    be at all astonishing to discover that there have been three or four collisions of planetesimal size on our
    planet since the Cambrian--perhaps one every two or three hundred million years.

    Heat of impact is amazingly effective. It has been discovered, for example, that battleship projectiles
    melt their way through several inches of steel armour as a result of the terrific heat energy of their
    slowing down. The energy of travel is converted to heat energy by the cessation of travel.

    Meteorites that are slowed down by passage through the atmosphere become incandescent, and their
    outer surfaces not only melt, but even boil. Even stone and nickel-iron vaporize--the latter at about
    2,500° C. Study of the surfaces of available meteorites amply confirms this. The larger the meteorite
    (the greater its momentum) the less it is slowed down by passage through air. Small ones settle like
    drifting dust. Medium sized ones hit like cannon balls. One that was hundreds of meters in diameter
    might retain nearly its full interplanetary speed. Kulik estimated the speed of impact of the Vanovara
    meteorite as well over 50 kilometers per second. Similar speeds for newly arriving meteorites are
    recorded by Nininger, La Paz, Stocking and others. Much slower speeds are measured for the ordinary
    meteorite that has been slowed down to incandescence and is available for easy measurement.

    There is sound reason to expect that no extra large meteorite will ever be found anywhere, under any
    conditions. By "large" I imply units over a hundred meters in diameter. None are found, for example, at
    Vanovara, or at Chubb Crater, and none so large at Winslow. One's first assumption is likely to be that
    they are merely deeply buried, but another explanation is available.

    Let us assume impact at the speed of only 10 kilometers per second, and cessation of motion within a
    depth or penetration of one kilometer. Iron at high temperatures has a specific heat of about 0.15,
    therefore the temperature generated by stopping would be or a temperature of 6,666 degrees, which is
    more than twice the boiling point of iron. Assuming that half goes outward and half goes inward, the entire
    projectile would still vaporize.

    Let us assume a meteorite of 100 meters diameter. its kinetic energy would be MV2/2, its mass 3X107
    tons or 3X1013 grams. The total calories possible from the conversion of this kinetic energy into heat
    energy would be 1.5 X 1025, Or enough to boil 1016 tons of water. In the entire ocean, there are only
    some 1018 tons of water. The energy sufficient to boil 1016 tons of water would be enough to boil 3X107
    tons of iron, much of the surrounding earth, and still allow for terrific radiation outward into space.

    An impact at 50 kilometers per second (five times as fast) would yield 212,890,625 times as much heat,
    an almost incomprehensible figure. An impact at only 1 kilometer per second would still yield 1.5X1025
    calories, enough to boil 1014 tons of water. Assuming that to boil iron requires ten times the calories
    required to boil the same mass of water, this heat would still vaporize 1013 tons of iron, whereas the
    meteorite mass was 3X107.

    A meteorite so large as 100 meters diameter would instantly heat the vicinity of its impact; a region about
    twice its diameter, to vaporization, a much larger area to incandescence, more than a thousand kilometers
    diameter to the boiling point of water, and the whole world notably but briefly. The size of the crater does
    not reveal the size of the individual unit. For example, Winslow Crater may have been made by a cluster
    or shower of separate meteorites, each small enough to be considerably slowed by the atmosphere. On
    the other hand, one or more of the units may have been so large as to vaporize, even there.

    When iron vaporizes and cools, it precipitates in the form of minute spheres. Exactly such spheres are
    found around the Winslow Crater. The Vanovara meteorite was certainly lethal to a diameter of 60
    kilometers. The much larger Winslow meteorite was probably lethal for a diameter of 600 kilometers.
    One much smaller than the asteroid "Hermes" would be deadly for thousands of kilometers--a lethal belt
    actually circling the equator more than once. If it happened today, the human survivors might be only a few
    Eskimos, but they would re-people the earth in a few centuries. As on Krakatoa, they would find vegetation
    springing up from seeds and roots; there would be interesting survivors from Kerguelen and some mines in
    Siberia.

    In my short lifetime we have witnessed the astronomically close approach of the planetesimal "Hermes."
    There is every reason to believe that in the remote past others had orbits that brought them even closer to
    ours. A few such may have existed and then ceased by final involvement with the earth's gravitational field,
    a spiral approach, and collision. In a similarly short time the world has been struck by a meteoritic cluster
    that devastated a large area in Siberia. If this area had been in the United States, American scientists
    would have been impressed. They would not regard danger from impact as being preposterous, an
    assumption which is now common.

    It is not fantastic to consider the likelihood that an extra large impact affected this planet some sixty million
    years ago. No human being was here to see it, or study it with radar. But just such extinctions occurred,
    and just such survivals occurred, at the end of the Cretaceous, as would be expected to occur as the
    result of impact from a planetesimal or an extra large shower of meteorites. May we not take this into
    consideration as possibly having been the doom of the dinosaurs?

Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 30, No. 1, Page 207-218, January 1956

Dinosaur Extinction: One More Hypothesis

Max W. De Laubenfels, Oregon State College, Corvallis, Oregon

    Abstract: Attention is called to the great destruction that resulted from a meteorite impact in Siberia in 1908.
    A larger impact would cause more widespread destruction. Several larger impacts may have occurred in
    geologic time. The survivals and extinctions at the close of the Cretaceous are such as might be expected
    to result from intensely hot winds such as would be generated by extra large meteoritic or planetesimal
    impacts. It is suggested that, when the various hypotheses as to dinosaur extinction are being considered,
    this one be added to the others.
.
To comment on any of the pages in this website go to:

Rational Scientific Method   

|   Cam  |  Ord  | Sil |    Dev   |    Car    |    Per |    Tri    |    Jur   |       Cre      | Pal |Neo|
The History of Life on Earth

Home      

Nila and Bill      

Extinction       

Mathematical Physics      
Rope Hypothesis    
Ye Olde You Stupid Relativist