Adapted for the Internet from:Why God Doesn't Exist |

A sphere is not an analogy, but the Real McCoy |

I was only messin’ with y’all. I’m not a Real

like that just to see the look on yer faces,

ha, ha, ha, ha. You should see yerselves

now. Ha, ha, ha. I just took a picture of you.

Anyone wanna have a look? Ha, ha, ha...

Fig. 1 With or without time, the universe of relativity is a sphere |

Fig. 2 The Emperor's RobeA. The universe that relativists cannot even imagine |

This universe consists of a static geometric figure that has three physical dimensions: length,width, and height. What relativists have trouble imagining is a 4-D object, (i.e., a 4th dimension running perpendicular to the other three). Relativists say that this fourth dimension is time. Questions: 1. Is time a dimension? 2. Does the inclusion of time change the shape of a sphere? 3. If it does, is the result a 4-D figure? |

B. The universe relativists explain |

This relativistic universe consists of a dynamic movie: a sphere expanding ‘through’ timefrom the Big Bang to the present. A sphere is a solid. It has three physical dimensions: length, width, and height. Each frame in this relativistic movie shows a 3D sphere. Size is irrelevant because a larger cube is also a cube and not a hypercube. Clearly, we can illustrate and see this movie. So, why is it that relativists say that they cannot even imagine the alleged ‘4D’ (i.e., dynamic) universe they derive from their equations? Could it be that they confused physical for mathematical dimensions in their dissertation? |