What do the idiots of Mathematics mean by 'infinite speed'?
A subject all mathematicians should get an F in is grammar. 90% of the problems of contemporary Physics are of a semantic nature and could be avoided if the mathematicians simply took English 101. If relativists took the trouble to define the terms they are going to use in their presentations, they would at least be able to formulate their questions properly. For example, some mathematicians talk about the finite speed of light.
" the finite propagation speed of light causes radiation pressure forces to have a non-radial component " [1]
Others talk about the infinite speed of gravity.
" the propagation speed of gravity is not infinite" [2] " the theory requires the speed of gravity to be infinite." [3]
However, in Science, adjectives can only be used to qualify objects. We can perhaps say that a table or a rock is finite. Only an idiot would say that running is finite. Running is not a noun, but a verb. Running can perhaps be constant, perpetual, incessant, or tiring, but hardly infinite, straight, flat, or crooked. In Science, the former are exclusively used as adverbs and the latter exclusively as adjectives. This is not because I say so. It is because this is the only manner in which we can use these categories consistently (i.e., scientifically). Whenever a mathematician uses the adjectives finite or infinite to qualify speed, you instantly know that he is a moron. The mathematician is invoking ordinary speech rather than scientific terminology. The mathematicians may wonder why I harp on semantics. What’s this got to do with Physics? Science requires precise definitions of the key words that make or break the theory. A theory is not mathematical description. A theory is a physical interpretation. Only when the prosecutor explains does the jury have hope of understanding how or why an physical phenomenon occurred. The incongruous language used by the mathematicians only shows that they have no idea what they’re talking about. They are confusing nouns with verbs in the same presentation. They should at least get their language straight before making fools of themselves in public. How can they draw sweeping conclusions about the speed of gravity if they have never in their miserable lives defined the word motion? Then, to make matters worse, they use adjectives to qualify speed. But let's get to the nitty-gritty to see what kind of fools the mathematician of our world really are. What do our sages really mean when they talk about the ‘infinite speed’ of gravity? I don’t want to put words in their mouths, but perhaps the establishment is attempting to hypothesize or to theorize in so many words that the speed of gravity is instantaneous:
" Newtonian gravitation is described by the Poisson equation, according to which, when the mass distribution of a system changes, its gravitational field instantaneously adjusts." [4]
However, if this is the case, it amounts to a self-contradiction again because of language. It confirms that I am not mistaken on this issue. The mathematicians of the world are indeed a bunch of morons. If the word speed implies ‘two or more locations of an object,’ certainly it is irrational to talk about ‘infinite speed,’ meaning instantaneous propagation. We need a minimum of TWO frames of the Universal Movie to conceptualize motion. We can only conceptualize 'instantaneous' in a SINGLE frame! Speed is a movie. Instantaneous is conceptually a photograph. Instantaneous movement is not an issue of measurement or amounts or it being infinitesimal. This is strictly a conceptual issue. The term ‘instantaneous movement’ is an oxymoron that only stupid mathematicians entertain. Therefore, when the idiots of the religion of Mathematical Physics discuss gravity in terms of infinite or finite speed, there is more than just gravity that they don’t understand.