|Adapted for the Internet from:
Why God Doesn't Exist
|What is the hole into?
|I have no idea how this guy got here!
He mumbled something about trying to
escape into another universe through a
wormhole. Apparently, he got sucked
through our Holy Sewer and ended up
circling with the shit in Zeus's's toilet.
Fig. 3 Holes
|The idiots of Mathematical Physics first converted space into a physical
object. Now they are drilling holes into it.
|You poor fool!
How could we
|Relativists rely on the 3-D, spherical model of the
black hole to explain to you how a star shrinks and
becomes a black hole. When they want to explain
why a black hole attracts our Sun in its direction or
how a wormhole forms, the idiots revert back to the
2-D, gravity-well variant. Of course, if a black hole is
simultaneously 2-D and 3-D, you can already
imagine that this malleable hypothesis is certain to
come in quite handy to the prosecution.
|"a region whose surface
eventually shrinks to
zero size. And, since the
surface of the region
shrinks to zero, so too
must its volume. All the
matter in the star will be
compressed into a
region of zero volume"
(p. 49) 
|I don't know, Steve.
It still looks 2-D if not
3-D to me.
Fig. 3 The surrealistic wormhole of relativity
|A star is a solid. It is 3-D (length, width, and height). Relativists claim that it shrinks and
converts to a neutron star, which is also 3-D. However, relativists also claim that if a star
has a lot of 'mass' ( a concept), it shrinks first to zero size (meaning it becomes a 0-D
object). But this non-entity also becomes the 2-D entrance to a wormhole, a gofer hole
that connects two universes. The idiots of relativity draw these two universes as flat
planes, each with a mouth that is a circle. The question is, 'What contours these
universes above and below? What is the stuff that is on each side of these pancakes?
What stuff is the wormhole 'through'? Therefore, the incongruous situation arises where
a star is 3-D, but converts to a 0-D black hole which is a 2-D entrance to a flat universe
that has nothing on either side of it. Relativists insist that these surrealistic visions are
scientific because they are inferred from equations!